The material states that corruption can occur without warning signs.

• A. True
• B. False
• C. Not specified
• D. Sometimes

Answer: (B)

The main idea here is that warning signs are part of recognizing corruption. The material presents indicators such as unusual financial activity, conflicts of interest, pressure to bypass controls, or irregular procurement as signals that something corrupt could be developing. Because these warning signs exist in the material, the statement that corruption can occur without warning signs is not consistent with what is taught. So the claim is false. If you’re weighing other options, not specified would be incorrect because the material does discuss warning signs, and sometimes would be off because it treats warning signs as common rather than rare in the described scenarios. The key takeaway is to look for those indicators so corruption can be identified before it fully manifests.